[tighturl-users] Probable Feature

Ron Guerin ron at vnetworx.net
Tue Jul 27 14:00:56 EDT 2010

So, a friend of mine was using tighturl.com the other day and mentioned 
he was unable to use it to redirect to a driver file he needed because 
it was a self-extracting archive, and thus an executable file, which are 
banned over at tighturl.com (and also by any of you who haven't disabled 
this behavior).

Admittedly this is pretty much the first time ever I'm aware of someone 
wanting to redirect to an .exe file that wasn't really an attempt to 
exploit someone else's system, but the goal of TightURL is to prevent 
abuse without unnecessarily restricting legitimate activity.

So the idea I'm thinking of is to start allowing redirections to 
executables via an intervening web page, ie: TightURLs that contain 
"possibly dangerous content" would instead put up a web page with a 
hyperlink to that content instead of redirecting, giving the user both 
an opportunity to see the URL before clicking on it, and a warning about 
the content.

Any thoughts?

- Ron

More information about the TightURL-users mailing list